VERBATIM: The three things Williamstown's planning-board majority seeks from Mike Deep | Anne McCallum
This is the second of a series of posts on the text-archive site of GreylockNews.com addressing issues which will be before Williamstown voters at the May 17 annual Town Meeting. The following is the text of a statement provided by Ann McCallum, an architect who is among the three members of the Williamstown Planning Board who voted at a March 12 meeting not to recommend voters approve a zoning change for Michael Deep's proposed multi-room lodging development at the Waubeeka Golf Links in South Williamstown. You can read two news accounts of the meeting on iBerkshires or in the Berkshire Eagle.
"We on the Williamstown Planning Board heard a petition about six months ago from Mike Deep, who owns the Waubeeka golf course. The following is an account of subsequent events.
"Mr. Deep claimed the golf course is losing money and that a new hotel might keep it afloat. Would the PB be behind rezoning the site to allow a hotel (presently not an allowed use in Rural Residence zones)? This was an unusual request, and one generally frowned on as “spot zoning” meaning that it would benefit not a swath of town but just one owner of one lot. The Planning Board agreed that in this case, enabling most of the golf course to stay as open space could also benefit the whole town, as it would keep the important southern gateway to the Town with its gorgeous mountain views, so important to all of us residents as well as to our tourist industry.
"The agreed upon idea was that he would take part of the property to develop as his hotel, and in return he would ensure that the rest of the property would be left as open space never to be built on.
"Over the course of several meetings, we tried to hammer out a by-law that would satisfy both parties, but there remained intractable sticking points such as how many acres the development would cover and how to ensure the open land would stay as open land, Eventually it was clear we could not reach consensus.
"With the open-ended by-law Mr. Deep wanted, the Town would run the risk of a disaster: an inappropriately sized development for this crucial part of town, or worse still one that would start with enthusiasm and then run out of money and be abandoned after just a few years. So we passed a motion saying the Planning Board was enthusiastically behind the idea of a country inn on the golf course (to help assure potential developers) and asking Mr. Deep to provide three items before we went any further:
"Once we had that, we could craft the appropriate by-law to accommodate his needs.
"Not willing to provide the Planning Board’s requests (though he provided partial answers at the recent Public Hearing), Mr. Deep is going for an end run around the Board, with a citizen’s petition that will be voted on at Town Meeting, by-passing the Planning Board. The opinion of a majority of the Planning Board members remains opposed to this petition.
"Development at any cost is not good Planning."
"We on the Williamstown Planning Board heard a petition about six months ago from Mike Deep, who owns the Waubeeka golf course. The following is an account of subsequent events.
"Mr. Deep claimed the golf course is losing money and that a new hotel might keep it afloat. Would the PB be behind rezoning the site to allow a hotel (presently not an allowed use in Rural Residence zones)? This was an unusual request, and one generally frowned on as “spot zoning” meaning that it would benefit not a swath of town but just one owner of one lot. The Planning Board agreed that in this case, enabling most of the golf course to stay as open space could also benefit the whole town, as it would keep the important southern gateway to the Town with its gorgeous mountain views, so important to all of us residents as well as to our tourist industry.
"The agreed upon idea was that he would take part of the property to develop as his hotel, and in return he would ensure that the rest of the property would be left as open space never to be built on.
"Over the course of several meetings, we tried to hammer out a by-law that would satisfy both parties, but there remained intractable sticking points such as how many acres the development would cover and how to ensure the open land would stay as open land, Eventually it was clear we could not reach consensus.
"With the open-ended by-law Mr. Deep wanted, the Town would run the risk of a disaster: an inappropriately sized development for this crucial part of town, or worse still one that would start with enthusiasm and then run out of money and be abandoned after just a few years. So we passed a motion saying the Planning Board was enthusiastically behind the idea of a country inn on the golf course (to help assure potential developers) and asking Mr. Deep to provide three items before we went any further:
- "A market study studying the hotel needs for North Berkshire County
- "A schematic plan of his proposal
- "A potential developer/partner, with whom we could discuss issues that would be important in ensuring a hotel that the Town would feel was worth the unusual trade-off.
"Once we had that, we could craft the appropriate by-law to accommodate his needs.
"Not willing to provide the Planning Board’s requests (though he provided partial answers at the recent Public Hearing), Mr. Deep is going for an end run around the Board, with a citizen’s petition that will be voted on at Town Meeting, by-passing the Planning Board. The opinion of a majority of the Planning Board members remains opposed to this petition.
"Development at any cost is not good Planning."
posted by newshare at 10:53 PM PERMALINK
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home