Daley, Hogelund Williamstown selectman seats
|Results just sent by Town Clerk Mary Kennedy:|
|SELECTMEN||PREC. 1||PREC. 2||PREC. 3||TOTAL|
|GARY FULS, JR|
A companion "bulletin board" to the main GreylockNews.COM website. You can post breaking news and community bulletin-board type announcements here in your own words. Just click HERE to send an email post. Your subject line will be the headline and your text will be the story. Put your name, emaill address and phone at the bottom.
|Results just sent by Town Clerk Mary Kennedy:|
|SELECTMEN||PREC. 1||PREC. 2||PREC. 3||TOTAL|
|GARY FULS, JR|
From: Ken Swiatek <email@example.com>
Date: March 26, 2014, 6:15:30 AM EDT
Subject: Questions on the North Adams Regonal Hospital Closing
NARH Closing – Answers Needed – Thank You!
Here are some questions and comments I have regarding the North Adams Regional Hospital (NARH) scheduled for March 28, 2014 that was announced on March 25, 2014.
1. Who, if anybody “owns” the hospital?
2. Do members of the NARH Board of Directors receive any form of compensation?
3. How can the Board of Trustees close the hospital without even proposing any succession plan like a 24/7 hour medical emergency stop business? This seems an awful lot like a cut and run decision, even if it was carefully planned for months.
4. Does Berkshire Medical Center have a helicopter landing pad like Southern Vermont Hospital?
5. How soon will the Williamstown, North Adams, Adams ambulance services be getting a medical helicopter? Where will it be housed?
6. Why would any parents from outside the area want to send their children to Williams College or MCLA given that there is no nearby hospital? (Per the Williams Record, Williams sends several students weekly to NARH for alcohol/drug overdoses.)
7. This closing is way, way more devastating than the Sprague Electric closing, in the magnitude of 4-6X worse.
8. I hope this vote of the board of Trustees was not a ploy to play hardball and to bring the nurses union and the nurses into submission for pay and benefit cuts.
9. Please list all the salaries of hospital administrative staff.
10. Is Williamstown Medical Associates in any danger of closing in the next 5 years? If not, what have they been doing right that the hospital cannot do?
11. Is the Southern Vermont (Bennington) Hospital planning on closing soon? If not, what have they been doing correctly?
12. Here is a listing of the NARH Board of Trustees: give ‘em a call!
Julia Bolton, Jane Allen, Ellen Bernstein, Arthur Turton, Chi Cheung, Jonathan Cluett, Stephen Fix, Bruce Grinnell, Richard Jette, Byron Sherman, Martha Storey, Susan Yates, William Frado Jr., Tim Jones.
13. There is also a long list of the Board of Corporators:
14. Would an infusion/transfusion of major new blood on the Board of Directors have helped the hospital to be able to look outside the box? How about some sort of receivership?
15. This may be a wake up call for the Northern Berkshire area, but if it fails, who will be left to flip the light switch?
16. If anyone has answers to ANY of these questions, please send them along. Once we get a few answers, there will be many more Questions.
17. Property values and school enrollment numbers will stat plummeting in 3, 2, 1 ...
18. First they shut down our newspapers, now our hospital, what is next?
19. What will happen to NARH pensions, current and future?
20. See 1-18 above.
Ken SwiatekRadio: 91.1FM Tu 3 - 6 PM www.MCLA.edu/WJJW
|The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) was enacted on August 4, 1988 and became effective on February 4, 1989.|
WARN offers protection to workers, their families and communities by requiring employers to provide notice 60 days in advance of covered plant closings and covered mass layoffs. This notice must be provided to either affected workers or their representatives (e.g., a labor union); to the State dislocated worker unit; and to the appropriate unit of local government.
In general, employers are covered by WARN if they have 100 or more employees, not counting employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months and not counting employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week. Private, for-profit employers and private, nonprofit employers are covered, as are public and quasi-public entities which operate in a commercial context and are separately organized from the regular government. Regular Federal, State, and local government entities which provide public services are not covered.
Employees entitled to notice under WARN include hourly and salaried workers, as well as managerial and supervisory employees. Business partners are not entitled to notice.
What Triggers Notice
Plant Closing: A covered employer must give notice if an employment site (or one or more facilities or operating units within an employment site) will be shut down, and the shutdown will result in an employment loss (as defined later) for 50 or more employees during any 30-day period. This does not count employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months or employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week for that employer. These latter groups, however, are entitled to notice (discussed later).
Mass Layoff: A covered employer must give notice if there is to be a mass layoff which does not result from a plant closing, but which will result in an employment loss at the employment site during any 30-day period for 500 or more employees, or for 50-499 employees if they make up at least 33% of the employer's active workforce. Again, this does not count employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months or employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week for that employer. These latter groups, however, are entitled to notice (discussed later).
An employer also must give notice if the number of employment losses which occur during a 30-day period fails to meet the threshold requirements of a plant closing or mass layoff, but the number of employment losses for 2 or more groups of workers, each of which is less than the minimum number needed to trigger notice, reaches the threshold level, during any 90-day period, of either a plant closing or mass layoff. Job losses within any 90-day period will count together toward WARN threshold levels, unless the employer demonstrates that the employment losses during the 90-day period are the result of separate and distinct actions and causes.
Sale of Businesses
In a situation involving the sale of part or all of a business, the following requirements apply. (1) In each situation, there is always an employer responsible for giving notice. (2) If the sale by a covered employer results in a covered plant closing or mass layoff, the required parties (discussed later) must receive at least 60 days notice. (3) The seller is responsible for providing notice of any covered plant closing or mass layoff which occurs up to and including the date/time of the sale. (4) The buyer is responsible for providing notice of any covered plant closing or mass layoff which occurs after the date/time of the sale. (5) No notice is required if the sale does not result in a covered plant closing or mass layoff. (6) Employees of the seller (other than employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months or employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week) on the date/time of the sale become, for purposes of WARN, employees of the buyer immediately following the sale. This provision preserves the notice rights of the employees of a business that has been sold.
The term "employment loss" means:
(1) An employment termination, other than a discharge for cause, voluntary departure, or retirement;
(2) a layoff exceeding 6 months; or
(3) a reduction in an employee's hours of work of more than 50% in each month of any 6-month period.
Exceptions: An employee who refuses a transfer to a different employment site within reasonable commuting distance does not experience an employment loss. An employee who accepts a transfer outside this distance within 30 days after it is offered or within 30 days after the plant closing or mass layoff, whichever is later, does not experience an employment loss. In both cases, the transfer offer must be made before the closing or layoff, there must be no more than a 6 month break in employment, and the new job must not be deemed a constructive discharge. These transfer exceptions from the "employment loss" definition apply only if the closing or layoff results from the relocation or consolidation of part or all of the employer's business.
An employer does not need to give notice if a plant closing is the closing of a temporary facility, or if the closing or mass layoff is the result of the completion of a particular project or undertaking. This exemption applies only if the workers were hired with the understanding that their employment was limited to the duration of the facility, project or undertaking. An employer cannot label an ongoing project "temporary" in order to evade its obligations under WARN.
An employer does not need to provide notice to strikers or to workers who are part of the bargaining unit(s) which are involved in the labor negotiations that led to a lockout when the strike or lockout is equivalent to a plant closing or mass layoff. Non-striking employees who experience an employment loss as a direct or indirect result of a strike and workers who are not part of the bargaining unit(s) which are involved in the labor negotiations that led to a lockout are still entitled to notice.
An employer does not need to give notice when permanently replacing a person who is an "economic striker" as defined under the National Labor Relations Act.
Who Must Receive Notice
The employer must give written notice to the chief elected officer of the exclusive representative(s) or bargaining agency(s) of affected employees and to unrepresented individual workers who may reasonably be expected to experience an employment loss. This includes employees who may lose their employment due to "bumping," or displacement by other workers, to the extent that the employer can identify those employees when notice is given. If an employer cannot identify employees who may lose their jobs through bumping procedures, the employer must provide notice to the incumbents in the jobs which are being eliminated. Employees who have worked less than 6 months in the last 12 months and employees who work an average of less than 20 hours a week are due notice, even though they are not counted when determining the trigger levels.
The employer must also provide notice to the State dislocated worker unit and to the chief elected official of the unit of local government in which the employment site is located.
With three exceptions, notice must be timed to reach the required parties at least 60 days before a closing or layoff. When the individual employment separations for a closing or layoff occur on more than one day, the notices are due to the representative(s), State dislocated worker unit and local government at least 60 days before each separation. If the workers are not represented, each worker's notice is due at least 60 days before that worker's separation.
The exceptions to 60-day notice are:
(1) Faltering company. This exception, to be narrowly construed, covers situations where a company has sought new capital or business in order to stay open and where giving notice would ruin the opportunity to get the new capital or business, and applies only to plant closings;
(2) unforeseeable business circumstances. This exception applies to closings and layoffs that are caused by business circumstances that were not reasonably foreseeable at the time notice would otherwise have been required; and
(3) Natural disaster. This applies where a closing or layoff is the direct result of a natural disaster, such as a flood, earthquake, drought or storm.
If an employer provides less than 60 days advance notice of a closing or layoff and relies on one of these three exceptions, the employer bears the burden of proof that the conditions for the exception have been met. The employer also must give as much notice as is practicable. When the notices are given, they must include a brief statement of the reason for reducing the notice period in addition to the items required in notices.
Form and Content of Notice
No particular form of notice is required. However, all notices must be in writing. Any reasonable method of delivery designed to ensure receipt 60 days before a closing or layoff is acceptable.
Notice must be specific. Notice may be given conditionally upon the occurrence or non-occurrence of an event only when the event is definite and its occurrence or nonoccurrence will result in a covered employment action less than 60 days after the event.
The content of the notices to the required parties is listed in section 639.7 of theWARN final regulations. Additional notice is required when the date(s) or 14-day period(s) for a planned plant closing or mass layoff are extended beyond the date(s) or 14-day period(s) announced in the original notice.
No particular form of record is required. The information employers will use to determine whether, to whom, and when they must give notice is information that employers usually keep in ordinary business practices and in complying with other laws and regulations.
An employer who violates the WARN provisions by ordering a plant closing or mass layoff without providing appropriate notice is liable to each aggrieved employee for an amount including back pay and benefits for the period of violation, up to 60 days. The employer's liability may be reduced by such items as wages paid by the employer to the employee during the period of the violation and voluntary and unconditional payments made by the employer to the employee.
An employer who fails to provide notice as required to a unit of local government is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $500 for each day of violation. This penalty may be avoided if the employer satisfies the liability to each aggrieved employee within 3 weeks after the closing or layoff is ordered by the employer.
Enforcement of WARN requirements is through the United States district courts. Workers, representatives of employees and units of local government may bring individual or class action suits. In any suit, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs.
Specific requirements of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act may be found in the Act itself, Public Law 100-379 (29 U.S.C. 210l, et seq.) The Department of Labor published final regulations on April 20, 1989 in the FederalRegister (Vol. 54, No. 75). The regulations appear at 20 CFR Part 639.
General questions on the regulations may be addressed to:
U.S. Department of LaborThe Department of Labor, since it has no administrative or enforcement responsibility under WARN, cannot provide specific advice or guidance with respect to individual situations.
This is one of a series of fact sheets highlighting U.S. Department of Labor programs. It is intended as a general description only and does not carry the force of legal opinion.
From: WMass Jobs with Justice <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:31 PM
Subject: [Workers' Rights] URGENT ACTION! Northern Berkshire Healthcare closing hospital
A community demonstration is being planned for Friday, 9:30am. See below.
North Adams Regional Hospital, the Northern Berkshire Visiting Nurses Association & Hospice of Northern Berkshire, and three medical practices -- all under the umbrella of Northern Berkshire Healthcare -- will close on Friday, leaving 530 full- and part-time employees without jobs and thousands of patients with no immediate health care answers. (Berkshire Eagle; click for more)
State and local officials are scrambling to save North Adams Regional Hospital from closure Friday, even if it is only a temporary reprieve until it can be merged with a more stable partner. (MassLive; click for more)
Union workers there are represented by the Massachusetts Nurses Association (100 members) and 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East (nearly 200). Their statements are below. They plan to fight the closure, as does the April 4th Coalition. All are Western Mass. Jobs with Justice Organizational Members and need our solidarity.
A community demonstration is being planned for Friday, 9:30am.
· Please publicize this event through whatever networks you have.
· Become involved and let your voices be heard. Do not quietly accept this loss. Take the time to be at the demonstration.
Below is a statement by the Massachusetts Nurses Association/National Nurses United:
North Adams Regional Hospital has announced this afternoon that they are closing the hospital as of Friday, providing the patients, community and workforce served by this hospital with just three days' notice.
NARH is a community hospital that provides desperately needed emergency and inpatient care to an isolated, rural community in the northwest corner of the state. It is outrageous to close this hospital so abruptly with no plan in place for the patients impacted by this callous decision.
We are not convinced that the board of trustees and management has fulfilled the legal requirements to allow the closure of this facility, and in any case, to do so in this manner is unacceptable.
While the board of trustees may have chosen to abandon this community, the nurses of NARH have not. We are meeting with all relevant public officials, working with others in the community and exploring every legal avenue open to us to save this hospital, or to at least ensure a safe transition for our patients.
The closing highlights a growing crisis in Massachusetts where the consolidation of hospitals into large corporate networks (such as Baystate Health and Partners), has left smaller community hospitals, particularly those that serve poorer communities, more vulnerable, with no source of support to ensure all communities have access to the care and services they need.
In addition to fighting to save this and other hospitals and services currently in jeopardy, the MNA/NNU is promoting a ballot initiative, the Hospital Profitable Profit Transparency and Fairness Act, which would establish a process for funding needed services and facilities for all communities in the Commonwealth. Coincidentally, a nurse from NARH testified about this issue at a State House hearing held on Monday.
Below is a statement from 1199SEIU:
This closure is unacceptable. Unfortunately, this crisis in North Adams is indicative of significant problems and disparities within the broader Massachusetts health care financing system.
Community hospitals in Massachusetts are in crisis largely as a result of low Medicaid rates and the disproportionately higher commercial payments made to higher-cost hospitals.
Healthcare workers are calling on state officials to immediately intervene and protect the vital, cost-effective services provided by North Adams Regional Hospital. This is a potentially devastating development for patients and workers alike.
This is a matter of life and death for many in the impacted communities who could lose access to emergency hospital services. A solution must be found.
From: "Kathleen E. Sansone"
Date: March 24, 2014 at 3:56:14 PM EDT
Subject: Greylock News Contribution
I have a listing I would love to be added to Greylock News.
MCLA PRESENTS! TO PRESENT DAN FROOT AND DAN HURLIN'S "WHO'S HUNGRY?"
This 90-minute puppet theater adaptation tells the oral histories of five
very different homeless and hungry people, through five 15- to 20-minute
segments, woven together much as a chef weaves a succession of flavors
into a cohesive multi-course meal. Overall, the project incorporates a
range of puppetry styles in order to give each of the five stories its own
aesthetic treatment. Presented on a specially built 24-foot dinner table,
the audience views the action from one side, as if they are banquet
guests. Incorporated into the evening are Delft china, Matchbox cars,
televisions, rod puppets, as well as puppets inspired by Japanese Bunraku,
and much more.
We are having three public showings at The North Adams Puppet Lab, 107
Main Street North Adams MA, 01247:
Saturday March 29th at 2pm and again at 7pm
Sunday March 30th at 3pm
Limited seating, For tickets call: (413) 662-5204
For more information, (413) 664-8718, or go to www.mcla.edu/presents.com
From: Adam Falk <Adam.F.Falk (at) williams.edu>
Subject: Local News
Date: June 20, 2013 8:59:44 AM EDTReply-To: Adam Falk <Adam.F.Falk (at) williams.edu>Dear Faculty and Staff,As summer enters full swing, I write to fill you in on several matters related to the health of the local community, upon which we all depend and in which the college is deeply invested. I apologize for the length of this message, but there's a lot to talk about.The first involves an announcement made Tuesday regarding Mt. Greylock Regional School. Several years ago, an alumna expressed interest in helping Williams by financially supporting change and innovation at the local middle and high school at a time of transition there. She and her mother provided $135,000 of seed money to be spent in the academic year 2011-12. With the college's help they solicited Williams-related members of their extended family, 20 of whom contributed $150,000 to be spent in the academic year that just ended. Wanting to provide two more years of this kind of boost, they continued soliciting each other while the college reached out to local donors, some of whom are affiliated with the college. The result, as just announced, is an additional $450,000 to be spent on professional and curricular development at the school over the next two academic years. This work promises to have positive effects on the experience of Mt. Greylock students for many years to come, and we're extremely grateful to the Jeffrey Family and local donors for this extraordinary investment in our community.The community's wholeness is the focus of another announcement, to be made this afternoon. A recent town-commissioned study confirmed the longstanding sense that Williamstown lacks sufficient housing that's affordable for a significant number of our neighbors. That was the case even before Tropical Storm Irene took the homes of almost five percent of the town's non-student population. Only a fraction of them have been able to return, to a situation that's welcome but temporary.The newly formed nonprofit Higher Ground approached us about the availability for affordable housing of a parcel of college-owned land that abuts Proprietor's Field. That elderly affordable housing complex was built in the 1970s on what also had been college land. A preliminary analysis of the almost four-acre parcel showed it to be so well-suited for affordable housing that the college, with the approval of the Board of Trustees, decided to donate it to this project.We requested proposals from five nonprofit affordable housing developers, and from their responses selected a team of organizations, including Higher Ground, that brings to the project both deep ties to the community and extensive experience if producing and managing affordable housing that's effective, environmentally sustainable, and sensitive to its neighborhood and community. More news about this project, which complements ongoing public efforts of a similar nature, will be in the news and on our web site beginning later today. I'll just add that, given how complicated affordable housing projects are by their nature, it's great that as of today the community actually has one underway.Another important part of the social ecosystem is Spring Street. When visitors from other small towns come here they often say, What, you still have a post office on your street? or You're kidding, you have an independent cinema on your street? or, my favorite, What, you have ice cream parlors on your street?!Yes, we're fortunate to still have within walking distance of campus some of the amenities that are disappearing from town business districts across the country, but right now those of us who live here are aware more of the recent losses of businesses on the street and share a longing for a sense of more vitality in our town center.Let me tell you about some things the college is doing to help advance the liveliness of the street at a time of rapid change in the national economy for small retail businesses.One idea centers on a hotel. We've heard from many quarters the desire to have in town more guest rooms that aren't lavish but aren't a motel. We also heard that an appropriately sized hotel and restaurant, reminiscent of a New England inn, if placed at the bottom of Spring Street, would provide the added benefit of drawing new energy all the way down the street. A professional feasibility study confirmed that a hotel of around 60 rooms, located somewhere around where the American Legion building is now, would be profitable. If this project were to go ahead, it would be developed with funds other than those used for college operations, and the running of the hotel would be contracted out. Such a project, of course, would take several years.Another key component of Spring Street is The Log. As much use as that unique building already receives, students and others are eager to see it used more consistently, particularly in the evening and possibly involving food as well as live music and related programming and entertainment. Many have stated the hope that The Log could become a place where students, faculty, and staff could interact not only with each other but with other members of the community. Steve Klass held a series of discussions with students, faculty, and staff to solicit ideas of how best to make these things happen and planning is now moving forward. Stay tuned.A third idea is the longstanding one of incorporating Water Street Books into a full college store on Spring Street. This college town is one of the few not to benefit from such a thing. The right opportunity has yet to emerge, and I'm told that the financial crisis of 2008 didn't help, but we're relaunching with vigor the effort to figure out a solution.All three of these initiatives have been, and will continue to be, discussed with relevant college committees.Regarding the commercial properties on the street that the college owns, we manage those not as a business, which the college is not, but as landlords with an interest in the availability of goods and services that are useful and desirable to students, faculty, staff, and other local residents, and as an institutional citizen of our community. On the other hand, we have to manage those properties in a way that doesn't drain money from our educational purposes and that treats fairly all of our tenants. When businesses close, as inevitably occurs for a variety of reasons, we look to fill those spaces with other suitable ones. That's what we're doing now with the spaces that have recently become open.There are bound to be other commercial changes on the street--people retire, semi-retire, move on, or go out of business for any number of reasons. The key is to adapt. That's what we'll continue to do as well as we can.If you've read this far, you must care as much about the community and the college's relationship with it as I do. Thank you for that interest and for all the ways that so many of you in your everyday lives contribute to the health of our region and help knit together our college and community.Regards,Adam Falk